Skip to main content

The Choice

R1149355 (Medium)^The E-P1 on a Sigma 300-800mm f5.6.  On a 4/3 camera, this Sigma lens covers an equivalent field of view to 600 to 1600mm.  I have not done the arithmetic to figure out what it will be on a M4/3 E-P1 or GF-1. 

If you have some legendary regular lenses from your film cameras, and provided that the right converter is available, should you invest in a full-frame DSLR or shift allegiance to an interchangeable-lens serious compact?

The question lingers over my mind after I checked out the full-framed A850 last week.

Deterioration of Optical Quality

For some technical reason of the imaging sensor, full-frame DSLRs demand harder from regular lenses than the SLRs do.  The top-rate regular lenses perform less good optically on full-frame DSLRs than on SLRs.  No wonder that since the advent of the fuller-sized digital cameras, digital-specific lenses have been launched.

Simply put, these full-frame DSLRs exaggerate the optical weaknesses of lenses in relation to sharpness, chromatic aberration, distortion and falloff especially along the edges.

In the case of serious compact cameras,  the smaller sensors make use of the central area of a regular lens.  That is to say, on these serious compacts, the regular lenses will see much milder optical defects along the edges.  It follows that, unlike on full-frame digital cameras, the widest aperture in the case of these compact cameras is still desirable.

Insignificant Image Quality Difference

In addition, unless you make large prints regularly, the extra image quality afforded by a full-frame DSLR is not actually visible.  Fact is, some professional photographers have noted that even for 20 by 20 inches prints, the full-frame sensor doesn't have an obvious advantage over the APS-C sensor.

Less Shaking

In other words, you will be better off with a smaller-sensor camera on a regular lens.  This applies to all APS-C sized sensors.  But now we have the better option of M4/3 cameras.

Theoretically, M4/3 cameras boast an additional benefit. In taking photos, a larger quantity of blurry images are caused by the operating reflex mirror and shutter.  Since the M4/3 cameras do away with the reflex mirror (another one if Samsung's NX camera), the camera probably suffers a lower failure rate due to the vibration.

Conclusive Remarks

Back to the question: Investing in a M4/3, or any interchangeable-lens serious compact for that matter, is more preferable than in a full-frame or even a APS-C sensor DSLR.  On second thought, this conclusion still makes sense even if the old regular lenses cannot operate on the serious compacts.  Well, portability counts.  I could sell my old Minolta lenses if I have to make the choice.

The serious compact cameras are gradually taking the throne of the popular camera market.  The juggernaut this trend is.

Comments

ch said…
I still prefer to use the old lenses on full frame camera just to avoid the conversion factor. Don't really care about optical quality since I use the old lenses just for fun. The conversion factor, which effectively narrows the fov and degrades bokeh, turns too many lenses into boring short teles...
Nevin said…
Hi, ch,
A very valid point you have. An extra argument against doing photography with regular lenses on a small camera is that the assitant focusing beam from the camera body can easily be blocked

To me, with the benefit of not having bought any DSLR yet, I am still waiting for the like of GF-1 to multiply among the camera makers. What I will need is probably an extra wide lens specifically for those serious compact. There is a rumour that even Nikon is fermenting a small-body big-sensor camera. We'll see.

Regards,
Nevin

.

Popular posts from this blog

A Real Hero

(Grip On Reality: This photo was taken on my way to work.  I was walking past trucks parking on a cul-de-sac when the ropes caught my attention.  The light was right, the colour was right and the criss-crossing pattern was perfect and I held up my GX200.  People passing by checked me out and wondered what could be made out of such a boring scene.  To me, the fun in photography is that the photographer makes something interesting out of what is not obvious to most at the scene.  The ropes tied in knots somehow reminded people I know who are in the grip of the recession) You must have also known a friend or two, or even yourself, being baffled by the spiral downturn of the economy.   Bank went bankrupt and the rich was faced with a shrinking wealth.  A friend of mine has just had his salary cut by over 10% and some of his colleagues started to be shed. But, wait. Was this done really for the sake of continuing the business? Or is there a factor or greed in it?  I wonder whether the

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).

Eye Contact

(Leica D-lux 5) The digital era may make it easier to end up with fave shots. Even lousy photos may be turned likable after a few clicks in the post-processing workflow. But if digital advancement or amendments have any bearing on the cultivation of personal style, no photographers will need to discover his or her own photographer’s eye. Undoutedly, this is out of the question. Only with a trained photographer’s eye can we give a thinking gaze and capture an eternal moment, in our unique style. Style is the soul of a great photo. A few posts have been written in GXG to touch on the topic of photographer’s eye. Instead of finding an answer, which would require academic discussions, the posts are intended to give my general reflections and spark interests in moving towards further exploration of the topic.  The posts can be viewed after the links: 1) Photographer's Eye: Storytelling 2) Photographer's Eye: Little Show of Observing 3) Photographer's Eye: Sight-Worthy 4