How on earth can anyone pick a camera with a prime lens (if you're just into photography, this refers to a lens with as fixed focal length) instead of a model with an all-purpose zoom lens? Some photograpers on the Internet have asked. Bearing in mind that some old hands with the Nat Geo used a prime lens throught their career, that I myself used the fixed 50mm and 28mm lenses for over a decade with my film Minolta, I have a definite answer springing to mind immediately: No prime, no gain. Two decades ago when photography just came into my dictionary, and surely the time before, prime lenses were the order of the day. I had been repeatly taught that prime lens, besides being better in optical quality, was best for training a photographer's eyes. The advantages of a zoom lens are two-fold. First, it gives the photographer an elbowroom in choosing different perspectives for the shot. Second, the photographer is with a wider choice in compostion. But first th...
Tasteful shots, ideas and info about serious compact cameras plus Hong Kong