Skip to main content

Backing Up

L1000100L (Leica D-lux5)

You can visit any photography forum (or camera forum, to be exact), randomly pick a post and have a high chance of running into one which evaluates and investigates the best possible back-up camera. That our mind is strewed with ideas and information of such cameras could be a ramification of the short cycle of digital cameras.

Recently, I have been in contact with young shooters selling their gear – their “back-up” cameras. To me, the proposition of such tyros having a back-up camera doesn’t quite parse.  In the film era, even experienced amateur photographers would rather spend on an extra lens than a so-called back-up camera.  Surely, whether in the film or digital age, a majority of professional photographers carry a back-up camera with them. The most obvious practical reason is to play safe as consequences will be too dire for them to go on an assignment with just one camera, which may malfunction or get broken in some unforeseen situations. For the rest of us, the need is not in at least 99% of our shooting.

What are the points of carrying around a X100 fitted with a 35mm equivalent fixed lens or a GXR M-mount with numerous vintage lenses as a back-up camera to our very responsive DSLR fitted with a 24-140mm equivalent zoom lens? We don’t do this.  A sane person will simply leave either one at home. The corollary is to sell those cameras one has less chance to use.

So, what we amateurs require is not a back-up camera but a second camera. A second camera should compliment but not overlap your first camera in various areas like the focal length, image characters, form factors, the mindset behind its design and production and so on. One may factor in all these elements or just some of them when grapping a second camera. But the focal length factor should probably be given major consideration. Take one of the sellers I met for example. He has a Leica X1 and a Fujifilm X100, and has put up both on sale.  His unspoken plan is to sell the one which meets a suitor sooner.  Why? While the two cameras are very different in all the factors listed above, the same 35mm focal length gives the owner no chance to use them on the same occasion.  There is simply no point to keep both.

As for me, lots of people who know me have asked about the reasons for keeping more than one cameras. The answer is simple: each camera is catered for what it is good at.  The A55 is primarily for night shots, sports and indoor events; the GX200 mainly for street shots which need an unassuming camera capable of covering an extensive DOF; the Leica X1 is kept for the Leica image characters and me to learn capturing the world in 35mm only. Usually, as a street photographer, when I bring along the A55, the GX200 is in a handy place in my bag because I don't wish to be busy changing lenses or backing up to a less prominent shooting position just to find that the scene was missed. I don’t consider the GX200 a back-up; it is a second camera for a reason. The logic is different and so is the purpose, which has an important bearing on the choice for one’s arsenal of cameras.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Real Hero

(Grip On Reality: This photo was taken on my way to work.  I was walking past trucks parking on a cul-de-sac when the ropes caught my attention.  The light was right, the colour was right and the criss-crossing pattern was perfect and I held up my GX200.  People passing by checked me out and wondered what could be made out of such a boring scene.  To me, the fun in photography is that the photographer makes something interesting out of what is not obvious to most at the scene.  The ropes tied in knots somehow reminded people I know who are in the grip of the recession) You must have also known a friend or two, or even yourself, being baffled by the spiral downturn of the economy.   Bank went bankrupt and the rich was faced with a shrinking wealth.  A friend of mine has just had his salary cut by over 10% and some of his colleagues started to be shed. But, wait. Was this done really for the sake of continuing the business? Or is there a factor or greed in it?  I wonder whether the

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).

Eye Contact

(Leica D-lux 5) The digital era may make it easier to end up with fave shots. Even lousy photos may be turned likable after a few clicks in the post-processing workflow. But if digital advancement or amendments have any bearing on the cultivation of personal style, no photographers will need to discover his or her own photographer’s eye. Undoutedly, this is out of the question. Only with a trained photographer’s eye can we give a thinking gaze and capture an eternal moment, in our unique style. Style is the soul of a great photo. A few posts have been written in GXG to touch on the topic of photographer’s eye. Instead of finding an answer, which would require academic discussions, the posts are intended to give my general reflections and spark interests in moving towards further exploration of the topic.  The posts can be viewed after the links: 1) Photographer's Eye: Storytelling 2) Photographer's Eye: Little Show of Observing 3) Photographer's Eye: Sight-Worthy 4