Skip to main content

Property Hegemony

R9353045L (Ricoh GX200)

Property Hegemony is a hot issue in the city.  It refers to the near or actual cartel comprising the local tycoons in the property market.  A worthy read on the topic is a book titled Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong by Alice Poon, a former assistant to a local property tycoon, who wrote it after she migrated to Canada. The book won the Canadian Book Review Annual a few years ago. 

Property hegemony is not an illusionary thing.  Alice has given her readers lots of data to justify the debate.  For example, in 2010, the six richest local clans who are all property developers controlled 14.7% of the Hong Kong stock market value.  This gives a glimpse into the result of the fact that while from 1991 to 1994, 70% of Hong Kong’s private property were built by seven property developers, 55% out of this amount was developed by four of the seven developers.  Today, most major property sites are owned by the biggest three to four among them.

The adverse impacts are very strongly felt.  Hong Kong is the third most expensive Asian city for living costs; fourth most expensive metropolitan city for property costs – worst than Tokyo; second most expensive city around the world for commercial premises rents.  These are not the most updated data yet.  Never has Hong Kong been so hijacked over the property rentals and purchase prices.  Exactly because every economy is so very reliant on land, and the land in Hong Kong is monopolised by the big property developers, it strips the businesses off their bargaining power in competing for rented premises and the common people in purchasing homes.  In bad times or good, a whole lot of earnings and profits go to the major property developers, who have used the enormous proceeds to extend their control to public utilities, retailing and public transport companies.  The situation is complicated by what is known as the high land-price policy, which in the end turns into a de facto land tax heavily burdening the masses. 

This tilted development has grown a deep-rooted property speculation culture among the local upper-middles, which, worse still, is fuelled up by the nouveau riches from Mainland China.

How polarised has all these made Hong Kong in terms of wealth?  In 2009, Hong Kong is on a par with the Switzerland in terms of GDP, which amounted to US 43,000 dollars.  That was pretty cool.  But the poor and the rich were then living with a wealth gap at as high as 43.4 Gini Coefficient, second to the 43.6 of, guess where, the Central African Republic.

In 2009, out of its some 7 million population were 1.23 million people living below the poverty line.  Simply put, one out of seven on the street was poorer than you know.  Among these unprivileged lot, 10 thousands called the “caged men hostels” home.  They themselves are known as the caged men.  What are caged men hostels?  Venture into some old area in Hong Kong and you will find some dilapidated pre-war residential buildings, or known as tenement buildings.  In them are apartments split into a number of 20-by-20-metres cubicles which are cramped with three-level bunker beds.  Each caged man rents one of the levels for what they call home.

If you wish to learn more about the topic, read Alice's book.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Real Hero

(Grip On Reality: This photo was taken on my way to work.  I was walking past trucks parking on a cul-de-sac when the ropes caught my attention.  The light was right, the colour was right and the criss-crossing pattern was perfect and I held up my GX200.  People passing by checked me out and wondered what could be made out of such a boring scene.  To me, the fun in photography is that the photographer makes something interesting out of what is not obvious to most at the scene.  The ropes tied in knots somehow reminded people I know who are in the grip of the recession) You must have also known a friend or two, or even yourself, being baffled by the spiral downturn of the economy.   Bank went bankrupt and the rich was faced with a shrinking wealth.  A friend of mine has just had his salary cut by over 10% and some of his colleagues started to be shed. But, wait. Was this done really for the sake of continuing the business? Or is there a factor or greed in it?  I wonder whether the

Eye Contact

(Leica D-lux 5) The digital era may make it easier to end up with fave shots. Even lousy photos may be turned likable after a few clicks in the post-processing workflow. But if digital advancement or amendments have any bearing on the cultivation of personal style, no photographers will need to discover his or her own photographer’s eye. Undoutedly, this is out of the question. Only with a trained photographer’s eye can we give a thinking gaze and capture an eternal moment, in our unique style. Style is the soul of a great photo. A few posts have been written in GXG to touch on the topic of photographer’s eye. Instead of finding an answer, which would require academic discussions, the posts are intended to give my general reflections and spark interests in moving towards further exploration of the topic.  The posts can be viewed after the links: 1) Photographer's Eye: Storytelling 2) Photographer's Eye: Little Show of Observing 3) Photographer's Eye: Sight-Worthy 4

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).