Skip to main content

Through the Eye of Adjudicators

RIMG0833 (Medium)A boring photo.

A post last week recommended two photo contests to you. Have you figured out which photos to pick?

Taking part in a photo contest is an educational process. For the same theme, you will be amazed by how many different interpretations to produce a wide array of the final images. You learn from the winners about what make their works tick. If you're the winner, the result could unleash your photographic creativity to another level as your talents and skills are then proven.

RIMG0837 (Medium)Why not walk the scene and shoot from a novel point of view?

Winning a photo contests requires a combination of, or rather a coincidence of, different factors. As far as my experience goes, they are:

1. Be passionate about your life. In other words, as discussed before, photographers have to "feel" the scene before taking a shot. The ability to feel a scene is nourished by your passion in life. Without passion or feelings, photographers can never produce images which really captivate people's eyes and minds.

RIMG1026 (Medium)Can't be more boring than this?

2. Make use of post-processing unless it is not allowed. Here we are talking about only the tweaking to bring out the colours and down the undesirable elements in the shots which were subdued or exaggerated by the actual shooting conditions. However, in most photo contests organised by non-photographers, which unfortunately is usually the case, post-processing of any sort is forbidden. Fact is, digital photography is inseparable from post-processing.

RIMG1027 (Medium)Why not pan the camera and give the image a unique impressionist touch?

3. Most importantly, see your photos through the eye of adjudicators. Imagine yourself to be one of the adjudicators confronted by thousands of entries. As your senses are numbed by the sheer number of images, which photos do you think can really capture your attention? Much like in a debate competition where truth doesn't necessarily triumph, photos being photographically perfect do not surely win in a photo contest. With other things being equal, images which are done with a novel, intriguing and unique touch generally have a higher chance of winning.

RIMG1029 (Medium)Oh, this sucks!

Just because this is the case doesn't mean that you must make the images technically and compositionally complicated. After all, it is how best the images can reflect the theme that counts the most in a contest.

RIMG1033 (Medium)Hey, make use of reflective surfaces to produce a more intriguing image!

Comments

ismall said…
I love the final image- I have a thing about reflections.

Really interesting post and like the fact that you put in 'bad' photos too. It's funny because before I realized what you were doing I saw the first shot and thought "it's a bit rubbish by Nevin's usual standards ."

Agree with what you said on my blog re taking pics for myself and then making them fit a comp theme. Ones I've entered so far already existed prior to me seeing the comp.
Nevin said…
Thanks for the comment, Iseha. I am really as good as the worst photos get. Posting daily (since mid 2008) can sometimes be stressful and not good for giving out the "right" works. Looking for time to select the best and tidy them up in the yet to be opened Flickr account.

Popular posts from this blog

A Real Hero

(Grip On Reality: This photo was taken on my way to work.  I was walking past trucks parking on a cul-de-sac when the ropes caught my attention.  The light was right, the colour was right and the criss-crossing pattern was perfect and I held up my GX200.  People passing by checked me out and wondered what could be made out of such a boring scene.  To me, the fun in photography is that the photographer makes something interesting out of what is not obvious to most at the scene.  The ropes tied in knots somehow reminded people I know who are in the grip of the recession) You must have also known a friend or two, or even yourself, being baffled by the spiral downturn of the economy.   Bank went bankrupt and the rich was faced with a shrinking wealth.  A friend of mine has just had his salary cut by over 10% and some of his colleagues started to be shed. But, wait. Was this done really for the sake of continuing the business? Or is there a factor or greed in it?  I wonder whether the

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).

Eye Contact

(Leica D-lux 5) The digital era may make it easier to end up with fave shots. Even lousy photos may be turned likable after a few clicks in the post-processing workflow. But if digital advancement or amendments have any bearing on the cultivation of personal style, no photographers will need to discover his or her own photographer’s eye. Undoutedly, this is out of the question. Only with a trained photographer’s eye can we give a thinking gaze and capture an eternal moment, in our unique style. Style is the soul of a great photo. A few posts have been written in GXG to touch on the topic of photographer’s eye. Instead of finding an answer, which would require academic discussions, the posts are intended to give my general reflections and spark interests in moving towards further exploration of the topic.  The posts can be viewed after the links: 1) Photographer's Eye: Storytelling 2) Photographer's Eye: Little Show of Observing 3) Photographer's Eye: Sight-Worthy 4