Skip to main content

Through the Eye of Adjudicators

RIMG0833 (Medium)A boring photo.

A post last week recommended two photo contests to you. Have you figured out which photos to pick?

Taking part in a photo contest is an educational process. For the same theme, you will be amazed by how many different interpretations to produce a wide array of the final images. You learn from the winners about what make their works tick. If you're the winner, the result could unleash your photographic creativity to another level as your talents and skills are then proven.

RIMG0837 (Medium)Why not walk the scene and shoot from a novel point of view?

Winning a photo contests requires a combination of, or rather a coincidence of, different factors. As far as my experience goes, they are:

1. Be passionate about your life. In other words, as discussed before, photographers have to "feel" the scene before taking a shot. The ability to feel a scene is nourished by your passion in life. Without passion or feelings, photographers can never produce images which really captivate people's eyes and minds.

RIMG1026 (Medium)Can't be more boring than this?

2. Make use of post-processing unless it is not allowed. Here we are talking about only the tweaking to bring out the colours and down the undesirable elements in the shots which were subdued or exaggerated by the actual shooting conditions. However, in most photo contests organised by non-photographers, which unfortunately is usually the case, post-processing of any sort is forbidden. Fact is, digital photography is inseparable from post-processing.

RIMG1027 (Medium)Why not pan the camera and give the image a unique impressionist touch?

3. Most importantly, see your photos through the eye of adjudicators. Imagine yourself to be one of the adjudicators confronted by thousands of entries. As your senses are numbed by the sheer number of images, which photos do you think can really capture your attention? Much like in a debate competition where truth doesn't necessarily triumph, photos being photographically perfect do not surely win in a photo contest. With other things being equal, images which are done with a novel, intriguing and unique touch generally have a higher chance of winning.

RIMG1029 (Medium)Oh, this sucks!

Just because this is the case doesn't mean that you must make the images technically and compositionally complicated. After all, it is how best the images can reflect the theme that counts the most in a contest.

RIMG1033 (Medium)Hey, make use of reflective surfaces to produce a more intriguing image!

Comments

ismall said…
I love the final image- I have a thing about reflections.

Really interesting post and like the fact that you put in 'bad' photos too. It's funny because before I realized what you were doing I saw the first shot and thought "it's a bit rubbish by Nevin's usual standards ."

Agree with what you said on my blog re taking pics for myself and then making them fit a comp theme. Ones I've entered so far already existed prior to me seeing the comp.
Nevin said…
Thanks for the comment, Iseha. I am really as good as the worst photos get. Posting daily (since mid 2008) can sometimes be stressful and not good for giving out the "right" works. Looking for time to select the best and tidy them up in the yet to be opened Flickr account.

Popular posts from this blog

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).

Final Verdicts: GF2 in Action

(The rest of the GF2 review posts can be found here ) It is widely believed that the GF2 is a paradoxical downward-upgrade version of the GF1. So, after all the discussions of its bells and whistles, how does it perform in reality? First things first. Which or what kind of cameras should we measure the GF2 against for that matter? We believe that potential buyers of the GF2, maybe except for serial fad chasers and the diehard loyalists, are attracted by its smallness in size with a larger sensor to achieve better image quality, especially at ISO 800 or above. However, given the less satisfactory handling with for example just one dial, the GF2 cannot assume the place of a primary camera. Put together, these assumptions suggest that the GF2 is more suited to be used as a backup camera for social and street shots. Let's grill the GF2 on this basis. In the Hand An obvious merit of the GF2 is size. It feels much less bulky in the hand than the GF1 or the NX100, and just lik...

Dressing Up

(Camera: Ricoh GX200) On the street, a group of Chinese tourists are waiting for probably pick-up. With oblivion to the surrounding, this man changes his vest for an unknown reason to the author taking the opportunity to do a snap shot of the scene of an indecent taste.  The increasingly common sights, or eyesores considered by some, of people squatting in front of shops or in the thoroughfares, together with more billboards written in simplified Chinese, seem to push this international city towards the Chinese characteristics of the Mainland cities. The other day when the author visited the the aquarium and panda's home in the Ocean Park, there were, among the swamps of tourists, conspicuous signs saying, "Keep Quiet" and "Don't Use Flash".  The management of the Park has obviously deployed a much bigger troop of attendants to carry the signs around. On one occasion, one of those attendants was so annoyed that she went up to a tourist and made a big long...