Skip to main content

Transformer GXR S10 Test Results

RIMG1112 (Medium)

The S10 module is considered an upgrade to the GX200 (rumours have it that the next module will be a telephoto version).  So, we'll speak of the S10 in the GX200 context.

RIMG8318 (Medium)

The specifications have not spelled out any difference in the lens unit as compared with the GX200's lens.  The new 24-72mm f/2.5-4.4 lens is suffixed by VC, meaning vibration correction.  Fact is, a shake correction mechanism is also provided to the GX200.

4108307660_ac8b1e3fa7_o

While the GX200 uses the Smooth Imaging Engine III, the S10 employs the upgraded Smooth Imaging Engine IV, same as the CX2's imaging algorithm.

R0011592 (Medium)

A quick look at the MTF curve graph suggests that on paper, the new lens unit does a bit better than the old mate in image quality.  For your comparison between the quality of images by the S10 and GX200, some full-size photos taken at the same scene have been uploaded here.  It should be noted that instead of starting from ISO64 to ISO 1600 as the GX200, the sensitivity of S10 starts at ISO 100 but ends at ISO 3200.

RIMG1119 (Medium)

For high ISO shots by S10, the improvements are obvious overall.  I have no compliant about images up to ISO 400.  However, the ISO 800 images on hand show that details are visibly smudged if you really pixel-peep.    S10's ISO 1600 image feels like GX200's ISO 800 image, which are the thresholds to what is bearable to a reasonable human brain (unless the photos are taken in black and white so that the chorma noise is not much of a problem).   All in all, chroma noise is generally more controlled in the S10's high ISO images.

As an aside, we shall see if the CX3 will outdo the S10 in high ISO IQ performance given the fact that the CX3 uses GRDIII's noise reduction algorithm.

s10image setting^From top left clockwise: Vivid, natural, soft and black and white. 

The colour in the image is visibly milder than the A12's but stronger than the Gx200's.

The GX200 and S10 boost the same macro capability of doing a minimum focusing distance of 1 cm in wide angle and 4 cm in telephoto.

R0011564 (Medium)

In addition to the aspect ration settings previously available in GX200 (4:3, 3:2 and 1:1), the S10 adds in the 16:9 setting as the A12.

R0011594 (Medium)The lens cap LC-2 is of a sturdier built.  The curved planes closes tighter as compared with the LC-1's which have concerned some users for they believe dusts may get in through the tiny cracks.

RIMG8320 (Medium) RIMG8321 (Medium)

Next we'll take the GXR S10 to hang gai gai (walk around).

Comments

Marco said…
The LC-1 and LC-2 are a crazy looking design. I never baught it for the GX200 that I had.
Nevin said…
The LC-1 spoils the graceful design of my GX200. But as I am using it with the VF-1, it gives me a free hand which would have to take hold of the lens cap otherwise.

Popular posts from this blog

Comrades, Arise!

 (Ricoh GR) In their own unique style, the squatting Mainland Chinese tourists have become an eyesore a common sight in the usually narrow walkways around the more busy areas in Hong Kong since the r eturn of Hong Kong's sovereignty to China (Editor-in-chief's note: Officially banned phrase for political incorrectness) Chinese Communist Party resumed sovereignty over the city. Hordes of  the likes are too generous in their estimation of either the width of the sidewalks or the number of people passing by them, so stretching out an array of luggage cases in a disarray fashion for making rearrangement or taking a recess never seems to be too unedifying a bother to them. No location can dampen their determination in doing so, not even if it is right at a shop front, which is a somehow laudable national quality potentially in a positive way. Well, there are always two sides of a coin. Through the artistic eye of a photographer, can't these scenes be reproduc...

Final Verdicts: GF2 in Action

(The rest of the GF2 review posts can be found here ) It is widely believed that the GF2 is a paradoxical downward-upgrade version of the GF1. So, after all the discussions of its bells and whistles, how does it perform in reality? First things first. Which or what kind of cameras should we measure the GF2 against for that matter? We believe that potential buyers of the GF2, maybe except for serial fad chasers and the diehard loyalists, are attracted by its smallness in size with a larger sensor to achieve better image quality, especially at ISO 800 or above. However, given the less satisfactory handling with for example just one dial, the GF2 cannot assume the place of a primary camera. Put together, these assumptions suggest that the GF2 is more suited to be used as a backup camera for social and street shots. Let's grill the GF2 on this basis. In the Hand An obvious merit of the GF2 is size. It feels much less bulky in the hand than the GF1 or the NX100, and just lik...

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).