Skip to main content

Illusions of Mountains, Waters and Guildelines

R0018600 (Medium)^The photo was taken at midday when the low winter sun shone almost 45 degree into the window. The sunlight was on a fairly high ka level, whitewashing everything on earth which was the least flattering to a photographer. That is exactly when the WB Correction function of GX200 comes in handy, allowing the user to counterbalance the undesirable light source. Here the WB was corrected to cyan.

The few pictures here give you a real sense of how densely built Hong Kong is. This is a view from a high point on Kowloon (actually the height of almost 40th floor). The ranges in the background are the mountains on Hong Kong Island. People living in Hong Kong may feel nothing special about the mountains and the harbour. But they do the populated Hong Kong a big favour.

R0018602 (Medium) ^Here you actually see the old Mongkok/ Yaumatei area cramped with pre-WWII buildings and newer concrete towers, donning the area with a hap-hazard kind of development outlook. Paradoxically, it is the untidiness which adds a interestingly tipsy quality to the place on street level, especially when at night you feel really tipsy bumping into a hooker or two in this notorious red light district.

With the mountains clustering as the backdrops and the harbour breaking the land, Hong Kong looks much less jam-packed with buildings as it actually is.

The illusion works quite well, doesn't it? But we can't live on an illusion. Something must be done about the crampy building style in Hong Kong.

R0018604 (Medium)^People living lower than 30th or 40th floor can't enjoy much of a view beyond the farcades of the buildings flanking theirs.

Actually, there is an Urban Design Guildelines for Hong Kong issued by the government. One of the guiding principle to preserve what it calls the view corridors to the harbour and the mountains is restricting the height of buildings. Sadly, in the Hong Kong context, the principle is set out in a sarcastic way.

It is fine that the government has designated some vantage points from which the stripes of land stretch towards the harbour and the mountains are the view corridors. But this is simply turned into a joke as the Guidelines state that areas within the view corridors may have allowable heights ranging between 30 to 40 storeys (boo!) in the waterfront and above 60 sotreys (boo! boo!) inland! Areas outside the view corridors could have no height restrictions (boo! boo! boo!).

As if these are not enough to sink the lands of Hong Kong, the government allows super skyscrappers to be built in what it calls high rise nodes, as what you can see at the southern and western tips of the Kowloon peninsula fronting the harbour and most of the waterfront areas on the Hong Kong Island !

I gather that high rise node is a fancy name to cover up some policy slips which make it possible for the super skyscrappers to exist.

Now, we have another illusion (of the guidelines) to make the first illusion (afforded by the mountains and the waters) as long as can be. That's truly illusory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Real Hero

(Grip On Reality: This photo was taken on my way to work.  I was walking past trucks parking on a cul-de-sac when the ropes caught my attention.  The light was right, the colour was right and the criss-crossing pattern was perfect and I held up my GX200.  People passing by checked me out and wondered what could be made out of such a boring scene.  To me, the fun in photography is that the photographer makes something interesting out of what is not obvious to most at the scene.  The ropes tied in knots somehow reminded people I know who are in the grip of the recession) You must have also known a friend or two, or even yourself, being baffled by the spiral downturn of the economy.   Bank went bankrupt and the rich was faced with a shrinking wealth.  A friend of mine has just had his salary cut by over 10% and some of his colleagues started to be shed. But, wait. Was this done really for the sake of continuing the business? Or is there a factor or greed in it?  I wonder whether the

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).

Eye Contact

(Leica D-lux 5) The digital era may make it easier to end up with fave shots. Even lousy photos may be turned likable after a few clicks in the post-processing workflow. But if digital advancement or amendments have any bearing on the cultivation of personal style, no photographers will need to discover his or her own photographer’s eye. Undoutedly, this is out of the question. Only with a trained photographer’s eye can we give a thinking gaze and capture an eternal moment, in our unique style. Style is the soul of a great photo. A few posts have been written in GXG to touch on the topic of photographer’s eye. Instead of finding an answer, which would require academic discussions, the posts are intended to give my general reflections and spark interests in moving towards further exploration of the topic.  The posts can be viewed after the links: 1) Photographer's Eye: Storytelling 2) Photographer's Eye: Little Show of Observing 3) Photographer's Eye: Sight-Worthy 4