Skip to main content

Dynamism and Active Space

R0014314 (Medium) (This is an extreme example to illustrate the effect of active space with the girl bleeds out of the front of the frame and the boy out of the rear, leaving a large expanse between them which can be considered an active space. The dynamism is shown by the blurry motion of the girl and the active space into which the boy is moving. Cover the boy and the active space becomes dead. Note the the diagonal plays a part in leading the gaze of the viewers to and fro the two subjects)

A tinge of dynamics will add an extra dimension to an image, which I prefer to stationary ones. For one thing, the dynamics highlight the immediacy of the scene; for another, dynamic movements (especially blurry motions) challenge our visual perceptions more effectively. The image turns more engrossing and somehow puzzling, and draws a longer attention from the viewers. Contrary to what you may have in mind, the dynamism in an image can come from both real motions and suggestions of them as my experience goes.

So how can dynamism be created in an image?

Active Space for Moving Subjects

The answer should not be required making: By taking photos of moving subjects of course! This is where "active space" falls into for a good reason. When shooting moving subjects, a photographer will come up with better dynamic shots if some space is left in the image for the subjects to "move into", a.k.a. active space. This idea is contrary to the dead space tailing a moving subject. While an active space adds dynamism to an image, a dead space waters it down which should be avoided to some extent (meaning a large expanse of dead space is a big no but some dead space is harmless or even practically needed depending on the scene).

IMG_0627 (Medium) (The repetitive and progressive patterns start from the old man as the main subject for he is the one shows most of his face in the image. What is he peeking at? The patters and his gaze direct the viewers to find the answers. The Chinese characters are names of drinks and foods)

Active Space for Non-Moving Subjects

Usually, for non-moving subjects, a photographer can heighten the sense of dynamism with repetitive patterns and the direction of gaze. This has to be complemented with the use of active space which is the area the patterns or the gazes 'move towards' in the image. A proportionally larger area of active space can exaggerate the element of dynamism in the image.

Take the above photo for example, the most important/obvious subject is the old man with most of his face showing in the image. He is looking from the right to the left. The active space is the area ahead of him. If the first woman is left out and replaced by some dead space behind the old man, the corollary is that the sense of dynamism falls flat and the photo turns bland. Besides active space, the idea repetitive patterns is also at work in the image to suggest a sense of dynamism. The somewhat repetitive, progressive bodily movements of people in the queue direct the viewers' attention from the main subject (the old man) forward to the first woman to find out what keeps the man stealing a peek of (the answer is written on the plastic signboard above the woman: bites and drinks for growling stomachs).

IMG_0627 (Medium) (2) (This PP image is shown to show those who are concerned about the soft character of images taken with the GX200. The original photo was taken with a G10. Even at the Normal image setting, the photo looks too saturated in colours to my eye. However, this image character is loved by most consumers. Compare the original saturated image and this softer PP image. A more saturated image is destined to forsake some details here and there whereas a softer one lacks the vividness of colours. It is a matter of choice and taste after all)

My impression is that most shutterbugs go for stationary subjects, save for professional photographers. Dynamic images are less common. Could it be because they are technically a bit more difficult? This should open up other topics like motions with flash and shutter speed versus motions, which I should jot down on my list of topics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comrades, Arise!

 (Ricoh GR) In their own unique style, the squatting Mainland Chinese tourists have become an eyesore a common sight in the usually narrow walkways around the more busy areas in Hong Kong since the r eturn of Hong Kong's sovereignty to China (Editor-in-chief's note: Officially banned phrase for political incorrectness) Chinese Communist Party resumed sovereignty over the city. Hordes of  the likes are too generous in their estimation of either the width of the sidewalks or the number of people passing by them, so stretching out an array of luggage cases in a disarray fashion for making rearrangement or taking a recess never seems to be too unedifying a bother to them. No location can dampen their determination in doing so, not even if it is right at a shop front, which is a somehow laudable national quality potentially in a positive way. Well, there are always two sides of a coin. Through the artistic eye of a photographer, can't these scenes be reproduc...

Final Verdicts: GF2 in Action

(The rest of the GF2 review posts can be found here ) It is widely believed that the GF2 is a paradoxical downward-upgrade version of the GF1. So, after all the discussions of its bells and whistles, how does it perform in reality? First things first. Which or what kind of cameras should we measure the GF2 against for that matter? We believe that potential buyers of the GF2, maybe except for serial fad chasers and the diehard loyalists, are attracted by its smallness in size with a larger sensor to achieve better image quality, especially at ISO 800 or above. However, given the less satisfactory handling with for example just one dial, the GF2 cannot assume the place of a primary camera. Put together, these assumptions suggest that the GF2 is more suited to be used as a backup camera for social and street shots. Let's grill the GF2 on this basis. In the Hand An obvious merit of the GF2 is size. It feels much less bulky in the hand than the GF1 or the NX100, and just lik...

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).