Skip to main content

What the!

 

According to a news report in the local Apple Daily (as a reference, in the case of the UK, it is equivalent to the sum of the Sun and the Guardian), the DOLCE & GABBANA shops sent shop attendants and then security personnel to chase away people (journalists who did the investigation report after receiving readers' complaints) taking photos which include their window displays from the sidewalk or outside their shops on the pretext that the photos may be used for producing counterfeit products and mimicking the expensive window display design.

It is also reported that photography in such situations will be allowed for tourists but not for locals.

The local photography community is enraged by the draconian treatment of photographers and unreasonable claim to property rights.  Some people have already called via Facebook for people to take part in Sunday's photography group to shoot outside the shops.  The group will start the open defiance from 3 to 5 that day.

Here are some legal Q&As about street photography in Hong Kong:

Q:Where can I photograph at will?
A:There is no law in Hong Kong prohibiting people from taking photographers at public places, with the exception of private premises  where the owners can stipulate a “no photograph” rule and demand rule breakers to leave.

Q:Can I shoot private premises from a public area?
A:A private premises that can be visually accessed with a bare eye from a public area are taken to be displaying to the public, of which photography shall be allowed.

Q:Is it illegal if in that case the photos include copyrighted products and trademarks in a window display?
A:It shall not be construed as copyright infringement  unless proof can be obtained on one having used the trademarks to counterfeit the same to achieve the purpose of sale.  Otherwise, such items in display shall be regarded as displaying to the public and allow photography by the public.

Q:If a passer-by is photographed, can the person demand the photographers to delete the photos or sue the latter?
A:Hong Kong does not protect portrait rights in law.  Photographing passers-by is not a violation in law.  The passers-by have no right to demand deletion of the photos.  However, an injunction can be obtained from court for reason of being stalked or privacy to demand cessation of the shooting or publication of the photos.

Q:Under what circumstances will photographing in public areas result in public prosecution?
A:A charge on indecent act may be made if the photographers purposefully point the lens closely to others’ body parts or photograph others' chests or from under a skirt and so on.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comrades, Arise!

 (Ricoh GR) In their own unique style, the squatting Mainland Chinese tourists have become an eyesore a common sight in the usually narrow walkways around the more busy areas in Hong Kong since the r eturn of Hong Kong's sovereignty to China (Editor-in-chief's note: Officially banned phrase for political incorrectness) Chinese Communist Party resumed sovereignty over the city. Hordes of  the likes are too generous in their estimation of either the width of the sidewalks or the number of people passing by them, so stretching out an array of luggage cases in a disarray fashion for making rearrangement or taking a recess never seems to be too unedifying a bother to them. No location can dampen their determination in doing so, not even if it is right at a shop front, which is a somehow laudable national quality potentially in a positive way. Well, there are always two sides of a coin. Through the artistic eye of a photographer, can't these scenes be reproduc...

Final Verdicts: GF2 in Action

(The rest of the GF2 review posts can be found here ) It is widely believed that the GF2 is a paradoxical downward-upgrade version of the GF1. So, after all the discussions of its bells and whistles, how does it perform in reality? First things first. Which or what kind of cameras should we measure the GF2 against for that matter? We believe that potential buyers of the GF2, maybe except for serial fad chasers and the diehard loyalists, are attracted by its smallness in size with a larger sensor to achieve better image quality, especially at ISO 800 or above. However, given the less satisfactory handling with for example just one dial, the GF2 cannot assume the place of a primary camera. Put together, these assumptions suggest that the GF2 is more suited to be used as a backup camera for social and street shots. Let's grill the GF2 on this basis. In the Hand An obvious merit of the GF2 is size. It feels much less bulky in the hand than the GF1 or the NX100, and just lik...

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).