Skip to main content

Post Processed Blur

image
(Portrait with digital blurring effect)

What is a digitally blurred background in a portrait really like? I just bumped into some portraits done with a G10 in which the photographer blurred the background by post processing. So, let's further the discussion on compacts for portraits a bit with some more examples.

In the second part of the post on portraits, the advantage and disadvantage of extensive DOF with small sensors for doing portraits were discussed. Advantage: Great for quick candid portrait (and images with razor sharp eyes which are important for portraits; I should have mentioned it). Disadvantage: not really possible to blur the background; but it can be achieved in post processing or turning on the Marco focus.


image
(PP blurs: What do you think?)



Digitally Blurred versus Marco On

For the digitally blurred background in the above photos, the photographer must have meticulously done the PP work. To my eyes, however, the blurred background lacks the sense of transition in an optically blurred image. The results appear too artificially engineered.
Hampered by this limitation of small sensors, photographers have to be even more careful in choosing a shooting location to do outdoor portraits with compacts. Although it is not really possible to blur unwanted background, the option of trimming it by composition is yours.

Otherwise, turn Marco to ON in case a blurred background is necessary, and stand closer to your model. But beware of distorted images if you stand too close, in which case you may zoom to a longer end and re-orientate the position of your camera or the model to smoothen out the effect.

marco_portrait (Medium)
(Portrait with Marco focus on: taken with GX200)

Two Examples

Take for example, the above photo was shot in 35mm with the Marco focus on. Click open the photo and there I blurred the background by means of Marco focus. The camera was turned to one side to smoothen out the effect of distorted face due to standing too close to the model. A frontal portrait would look less pleasing because of the distortion.
(Studio look: post proceeded )
marco_portrait_pp (Medium)

Another example is the photo titled "Break Even" in the first post on compacts for portraits. I also did that portrait with Marco focus left to ON, which was in fact meant for other photos in the series. There is not much background to see but actually, the bars between the boys are blurred. The image is not really distorted, probably because the lens was zoomed to 50mm.


The link to the captured portraits is here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comrades, Arise!

 (Ricoh GR) In their own unique style, the squatting Mainland Chinese tourists have become an eyesore a common sight in the usually narrow walkways around the more busy areas in Hong Kong since the r eturn of Hong Kong's sovereignty to China (Editor-in-chief's note: Officially banned phrase for political incorrectness) Chinese Communist Party resumed sovereignty over the city. Hordes of  the likes are too generous in their estimation of either the width of the sidewalks or the number of people passing by them, so stretching out an array of luggage cases in a disarray fashion for making rearrangement or taking a recess never seems to be too unedifying a bother to them. No location can dampen their determination in doing so, not even if it is right at a shop front, which is a somehow laudable national quality potentially in a positive way. Well, there are always two sides of a coin. Through the artistic eye of a photographer, can't these scenes be reproduc...

Final Verdicts: GF2 in Action

(The rest of the GF2 review posts can be found here ) It is widely believed that the GF2 is a paradoxical downward-upgrade version of the GF1. So, after all the discussions of its bells and whistles, how does it perform in reality? First things first. Which or what kind of cameras should we measure the GF2 against for that matter? We believe that potential buyers of the GF2, maybe except for serial fad chasers and the diehard loyalists, are attracted by its smallness in size with a larger sensor to achieve better image quality, especially at ISO 800 or above. However, given the less satisfactory handling with for example just one dial, the GF2 cannot assume the place of a primary camera. Put together, these assumptions suggest that the GF2 is more suited to be used as a backup camera for social and street shots. Let's grill the GF2 on this basis. In the Hand An obvious merit of the GF2 is size. It feels much less bulky in the hand than the GF1 or the NX100, and just lik...

New Low Prices

The window shopping some hours ago has almost provoked my AgIDS illness.  Just in case you’re in Hong Kong or are coming here, and have the money to burn (All in HK$/ body only): GX200 = $3,280 GRD2 = $3,380 LX3 = $3,180 G10 = $3,280 Prices are available form a gear shop on the 1st floor of the Mongkok Computer Centre.   Besides these new low prices, I found that Wing Shing Photo (55-57Sai Yeung Choi St., MK Tel: 2396 6886/ 91-95 Fa Yuen St., MK  Tel: 2396 6885) is offering a Sony A700 + Carl Zeiss Lens package for HK$9,980 (hopefully, a bargain will make it some hundreds cheaper).